SADIRISA v. ABEYESINGHE
1946 Present:
Cannon and Canekeratne JJ.
SADIRISA, Appellant, and ABEYESINGHE, Respondent
351-D. C. Colombo, 2,075.
Evidence-Discovery of new
evidence after hearing of ease-Re-opening of case.
Where the plaintiff denied possession of certain documents which the defendant
(appellant) alleged were relevant to his case end, after the hearing of to case,
new evidence was discovered which indicated that the documents ware in fact in
the possession of the plaintiff-
Held, that, as the failure to produce the new evidence
earlier was not due to the defendant?s negligence or default, the case should be
re-opened so that the trial Judge might consider the new evidence and decide on
its effect and, if necessary, vary his order.
APPEAL
from a judgment of the District Court of Colombo.
G. E. Chilly (with him M. D. H. Jayewardene ),
for the 2nd defendant, appellant.
E. B. Wikramanayake, for the plaintiff, respondent.
March 8, 1946. CANNON J.-.
It was alleged by the 2nd defendant, who is the appellant,
that two plans, Nos. 169 and 170, referred to his case, but he said that he
could not produce them because they were in the possessio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.