KING v. EDWIN
1946 Present :
Soertsz A. C. J, (President), Wijeyewardene and
Canakeratne JJ.
THE KING v. EDWIN et al.
APPEALS 59-60.
S. C. 99-M. C. Gampaha, 27,853.
Court of Criminal
Appeal-Sentence-Reduction when excessive
The Court of Criminal Appeal will reduce a sentence when it
is manifestly excessive.
APPEALS,
with leave obtained, against two convictions in a trial before the Supreme
Court.
G. E. Chitty, for the appellants.
H. A. Wijeyeratne, C.C., for the Crown.
December 6, 1946. SOERTSZ A.C.J.-
This is an appeal, with leave obtained, only against the
sentences passed on the two appellants on a conviction in the case of each of
them of the offence of attempt to commit murder. There is some significance, we
think, in the fact that three Judges on an earlier occasion thought fit to give
the appellants leave to appeal in this case, and, speaking for the three of us
now on the Bench, each of us has reacted in the same manner on hearing the
sentence that was imposed on the two appellants. This is not adduced as a strong
argument in support of the order we are about to make, but it is put forward as
a matter which has som
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.