SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PERERA v. JIRASINGHE


Perera V. Jirasinghe

1946 Present : Dias J.

PERERA,
Appellant, and JIRASINGHE ( S. I. Police ),
Respondent.

1,038 - M. C. Gampaha, 31,685.

Evidence - Statements of a deceased person not relating to the cause of his death or to any of the circumstances of the transaction which resulted in his death - Admissibility - Evidence Ordinance, s. 32 (1).

Statements made by a person who is dead are inadmissible in evidence under section 32 (1) of the Evidence Ordinance when they do not refer to the cause of his death or when they do not relate to any of the circumstances of the transaction which resulted in his death.

APPEAL against a conviction from the Magistrate's Court, Gampaha.

H. W. Jayewardene, counsel for the accused-appellant,

J. G. T. Weeraratne, C.C., for the Attorney - General.

October 28, 1946. DIAS J.-

Although this is a comparatively trivial case, the question of law raised by Mr. Jayewardene, counsel for the accused-appellant, is one of importance and substance.

The accused was charged with causing simple hurt ( section 314 ) to a batgama duraya man called H. P. Jundiya. It appears that on March 9, 1946, the accused was in a boutique when this so



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top