PERERA v. JIRASINGHE
1946 Present : Dias J.
PERERA, Appellant, and JIRASINGHE ( S. I. Police ),
Respondent.
1,038 - M. C. Gampaha, 31,685.
Evidence - Statements of a
deceased person not relating to the cause of his death or to any of the
circumstances of the transaction which resulted in his death - Admissibility -
Evidence Ordinance, s. 32 (1).
Statements made by a person who is dead are inadmissible in evidence under
section 32 (1) of the Evidence Ordinance when they do not refer to the cause of
his death or when they do not relate to any of the circumstances of the
transaction which resulted in his death.
APPEAL
against a conviction from the
Magistrate's Court, Gampaha.
H. W. Jayewardene, counsel for the accused-appellant,
J. G. T. Weeraratne, C.C., for the Attorney - General.
October 28, 1946. DIAS J.-
Although this is a comparatively trivial case, the question of law raised by Mr.
Jayewardene, counsel for the accused-appellant, is one of importance and
substance.
The accused was charged with causing simple hurt ( section 314 ) to a batgama
duraya man called H. P. Jundiya. It appears that on March 9, 1946, the accused
was in a boutique when this so
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.