SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

KING v. FERNANDO M.G.P.


King V. Fernando, M.G.P.

[ COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL ]

1946
Present : Soertsz A.C.J. (President), Wijeyewardene and
Canekeratne JJ.

THE KING V. M. G. P. FERNANDO.

APPEAL 46 OF 1946, with Application 170.

S. C. 88 - M. C. Chilaw, 27,953.

Non- direction - Alteration of conviction by Court of Criminal Appeal.

In a prosecution for attempt to commit murder the verdict which the jury returned was one of voluntarily causing grievous hurt. Having returned that verdict, they went on to say that in their opinion there was "latest provocation". In the summing up the existence of the offence of causing grievous hurt on grave and sudden provocation was not brought to the attention of the jury.

Held, that, in the circumstances, the conviction should be altered and that a conviction should be entered under section 326 of the Penal Code.

APPEAL, with application for leave to appeal, against a conviction in a trial before the Supreme Court.

A. H. C. de Silva, for the appellant.

H. A. Wijemanne, C.C., for the Attorney General.

November 18, 1946. SOERTSZ A.C.J. -

This is a case in which the appellant appeals against a conviction of causing grievous hurt entered against h



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top