LOKU MENIKA v. SELENDUHAMY
1947 Present: Dias J.
LOKU MENIKA, Appellant, and SELENDUHAMY, Respondent.
S. C. 192-C. R. Ratnapura, 1,528.
Civil Procedure-Mortgage
Ordinance-Application for appointment of legal representative--Notice not served
on respondents-Decree entered-Application to set aside decree-Procedure.
Where an order is made ex parte the proper procedure to be adopted by the
person against whom that order has been made is, in the first instance, to move
the Court which made the order to set it aside. Such an application would not be
in terms of the Civil Procedure Code but in accordance with a rule of practice
which has become deeply ingrained in the legal system of Ceylon.
APPEAL
from a judgment of the Commissioner of
Requests, Ratnapura.
H. V. Perera, K.C. (with him S. R. Wijayatilake), for the second
defendant, appellant.
N. E. Weerasooria, K.C, (with him P. Navaratnarajah), for the
petitioners, respondents.
Cur. adv. vult.
June 10, 1947. DIAS J.-
The plaintiff B. A. Abraham Singho instituted this mortgage action, and as the
mortgagors were dead, he moved to have a " legal representative " appointed in
place of the deceased mortgagors unde
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.