SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SETUWA v. SIRIMALIE


Setuwa V. Sirimalie

1947 Present: Wijeyewardene S. P. J-

SETUWA,
Appellant. and SIRIMALIE Respondent.

S. C. 76-C. R, Matale, 8,939,

Kandyan Law-Kandyan haw Amendment Ordinance, proviso to section (10) (1) -Meaning of " child "-Includes illegitimate child-Paraveni property and acquired property.

The word child in the proviso to section 10 (1) of the Kandyan Law Declaration and Amendment Ordinance means not only a legitimate child but also an illegitimate child.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Commissioner of Requests, Matale.

S. R. Wijayatilake (with him R. S. Wanasundere), for the first defendant, appellant.

No appearance for the plaintiff and the second defendant, respondents.

Cur. adv. vult.

 July 16, 1947. WIJEYEWARDENE S.P.J.-

This is an action for declaration of title to an undivided one-third share of a land. One Puncha was admittedly the original owner of the land by right of purchase under a deed P2. He died intestate leaving his three children-Setuwa, Hapuwa and Nanduwa. Nanduwa died intestate about 1943. The plaintiff filed this action as the next friend of three minors who, she alleged, were the children of Nanduwa. The defendants denied that





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top