KANDASAMY v. BANDARANAYAKE
1947 Present: Dias J.
KANDASAMY, Petitioner, and BANDARANAYAKE, Respondent.
Application in Revision 339-M. C, Point Pedro.
Fugitive Offenders Act, ss.
13, 14-Application for surrender--Lawful authority to issue warrant-Endorsement
of foreign warrant-Indian law.
An accused was convicted by the Court of Sessions in India. He preferred an
appeal against his conviction to the High Court which affirmed the conviction
and sent the case back to the Court of Sessions under section 425 of the Indian
Criminal Procedure Code so that the Court of Sessions should give effect to the
order of the High Court. The accused, however, absconded to Ceylon and was
unlawfully at large in Ceylon before the expiry of his sentence.
Held, that a warrant for the surrender of the convict under Part II of
the Fugitive Offenders Act, 1881, should have been signed by a Judge of the
Court of Sessions and not by a Sub-Divisional Magistrate or Additional District
Magistrate. There being no proof that the Indian law authorised a Judge of
Sessions to delegate his powers under sections 92 and 425 of the Indian Criminal
Procedure Code to the Sub-Divisional Magistrate
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.