SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MARIKAR v. SITHTHIE MALEEHA


Marikar V. Siththie Maleeha

1947 Present; Howard CJ. and Windham J.

MARIKAR,
Appellant, and SITHTHIE MALEEHA, Respondent.

S. C. 35-D. C. Kalutara, 25,535.

Possession action-Right of footway-Claim for damages-Claim in reconvention that land be declared free of servitude-Whether claim maintainable.

Where in a possessory action the plaintiff claims not only restoration to possession but also damages, it is open to the defendant to set up his title by way of defence.

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Judge, Kalutara.

H. V. Perera, K.C. (with him H. W. Jayewardene), for the defendant, appellant.

No appearance for the plaintiff-respondent.

September 2, 1947, HOWARD C.J.-

We are of opinion that this appeal must be allowed. The plaintiff came into Court claiming that he be restored to his possession of a certain right of footway over the defendant's land for drawing water from the well on the defendant's land having access to the road called De Silva Street, He also claimed a sum of Rs. 100 being damages sustained by him and further damages at the rate of Rs. 2 per day from June 19, 1945. The defendant in his defence maintained that the plaintiff had no r





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top