KING v. PETER NONIS
1947 Present:
Howard C. J. and Windham J.
THE KING v. PETER NONIS
S. C. 126-D. C. Crim. Avissawella, 38,092.
Marriage
Registration Ordinance (Cap. 95), s. 38 (I) -Entry in register-Charge of
bigamy-Entry not produced-Best evidence-Admissibility of oral evidence- Penal
Code, a. 362 C.
The appellant was charged with bigamy. The prosecution produced no entry in the
marriage register book in proof of the first marriage but called in evidence the
first wife and the officiating priest. This evidence was un-contradicted.
Held, that the first marriage was properly proved. The expression
" best evidence " in section 38 of the Marriage Registration Ordinance merely
signifies that the entry in the register shall prevail over any other evidence
as to marriage in case of conflict as to whether the marriage was celebrated at
all or as to its character or any particulars regarding it.
APPEAL
from a judgment of the District Judge,
Avissawella.
H. Wanigatunga, for the accused, appellant.
Boyd Jayasuriya, C. C., for the Attorney-General.
Cur. adv. vult.
November 10, 1947. WINDHAM J.-
The appellant was convicted of bigamy, contrary to se
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.