SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

KING v. PETER NONIS


King V. Peter Nonis

1947 Present: Howard C. J. and Windham J.
 
THE KING v. PETER NONIS

S. C. 126-D. C. Crim.  Avissawella, 38,092.

    Marriage Registration Ordinance (Cap. 95), s. 38 (I) -Entry in register-Charge of bigamy-Entry not produced-Best evidence-Admissibility of oral evidence- Penal Code, a. 362 C.
 
The appellant was charged with bigamy. The prosecution produced no entry in the marriage register book in proof of the first marriage but called in evidence the first wife and the officiating priest. This evidence was un-contradicted.
 
Held, that the first marriage was properly proved. The expression " best evidence " in section 38 of the Marriage Registration Ordinance merely signifies that the entry in the register shall prevail over any other evidence as to marriage in case of conflict as to whether the marriage was celebrated at all or as to its character or any particulars regarding it.
 
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Judge, Avissawella.
 
H. Wanigatunga, for the accused, appellant.
 
Boyd Jayasuriya, C. C., for the Attorney-General.

Cur. adv. vult.

November 10, 1947. WINDHAM J.-
 
The appellant was convicted of bigamy, contrary to se




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top