OLIVER v. BORELLA POLICE
1947 Present: Dias J.
OLIVER, Appellant, and BORELLA POLICE, Respondent.
S. C. 1,172-M. C. Colombo, 30,899
Penal Code, s
156-Fighting in public place-self defence-Is it affray?
Where a person who is attacked on the public road has to flight in order to.
defend himself he cannot be said to be guilty of affray, even if the public
peace is disturbed.
APPEAL from a judgment of the
Magistrate, Colombo.
E. B. Wickremanayake, for the 1st accused appellant.
V. Thametheram, C.C., for the Attorney-General.
Cur. adv. vult.
December 2, 1947. DIAS J.-
The appellant, S. M. Oliver, is the owner of a servant's agency. He also owns a
" coffin business ". It is alleged that one Waragoda has a rival " coffin
business " not far distant from the appellant's establishment. The 2nd accused,
Podiappu, is the Manager of Waragoda.
The appellant and Podiappuhamy were charged and convicted of committing an
affray in breach of section 157 of the Penal Code. They were each fined Rs. 25
and ordered under section 80 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code to enter into
bonds to keep the peace.
It is alleged that on July 24, 1947, the appellant and Podi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.