SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ILLANGARATNE et al. v. DE SILVA G.E.


Illangaratne Et Al., V. De Silva, G.E.


 1947 Present: Windham J.
 
 ILANGARATNE et al., Petitioners, and G. E. DE SILVA, Respondent.
 
Election Petitions Nos. 4 and 5, Kandy Electoral District

    Election petition-Person not party to petition-Corrupt or illegal practice-Bight to be heard-Before or after decision of Judge-Right to cross-examine witness- Parliamentary Elections Order in Council, 1946, section 82.
 
Where a person, not a party to an election petition, is charged with corrupt or illegal practice, he must be given an opportunity of being heard and calling evidence before a decision is given as to the validity of the election. He would not in such a case have the right to cross-examine witnesses called by the petitioner

ORDER made in the course of the hearing of a Parliamentary election petition.
 
E. F. N. Gratiaen, K.C., with S. Nadesan and G. T. Samarawickreme, for the petitioner in Petition No. 4.
 
E. F. N. Gratiaen, K.C., with B. H. Aluwihare and S. E. J. Fernando, for the petitioner in. Petition No. 5.
 
B. L. Pereira, K.C., with U. A. Jayasundere, J. A. L. Cooray and S. J. Kadirgamer, for the respondent in Petitions Nos. 4 and 5.
 
C. S. Bar







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top