ILLANGARATNE et al. v. DE SILVA G.E.
1947 Present: Windham J.
ILANGARATNE et al., Petitioners, and G. E. DE SILVA, Respondent.
Election Petitions Nos. 4 and 5, Kandy Electoral District
Election petition-Person
not party to petition-Corrupt or illegal practice-Bight to be heard-Before or
after decision of Judge-Right to cross-examine witness- Parliamentary Elections
Order in Council, 1946, section 82.
Where a person, not a party to an election petition, is charged with corrupt or
illegal practice, he must be given an opportunity of being heard and calling
evidence before a decision is given as to the validity of the election. He would
not in such a case have the right to cross-examine witnesses called by the
petitioner
ORDER made in the
course of the hearing of a Parliamentary election petition.
E. F. N. Gratiaen, K.C., with S. Nadesan and G. T. Samarawickreme, for the
petitioner in Petition No. 4.
E. F. N. Gratiaen, K.C., with B. H. Aluwihare and S. E. J. Fernando, for the
petitioner in. Petition No. 5.
B. L. Pereira, K.C., with U. A. Jayasundere, J. A. L. Cooray and S. J.
Kadirgamer, for the respondent in Petitions Nos. 4 and 5.
C. S. Bar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.