NADARAJAH et al. v. KANAPATHY et al.
1948 Present: Howard C.J. and
Nagalingam J.
NADARAJAH et al., Appellants, and KANAPATHY et al. Respondents,
S. C. 298-D. C. Jaffna, 66.
Trust-Notarial conveyance
of land-Transferee to pay off mortgage debt on land- Oral agreement to hold land
in trust till debt was repaid-Is agreement enforceable f-Statute of
Frauds-Trusts Ordinance, section 5 (3).
By deed P 1, notarially attested, plaintiff's mother since dead and the
co-plaintiffs transferred certain lands to the first defendant. These lands were
subject to mortgage decrees in favour of the second and third defendants. The
consideration for the transfer was the amount due on the decrees. There was an
oral agreement between the parties that the first defendant was to re-transfer
the lands on payment to him within a reasonable time of the amount due on the
mortgage decrees which he had undertaken to settle and that he should hold the
land in trust till then
Held, that the agreement was enforceable ,at law although it was not
notarially attested. To hold otherwise would allow the Statute of Frauds to be
used us a protection or vehicle for frauds.
Valliyammai
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.