SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PUNCHIAPPUHAMY v. WIJESINGHE


Punchiappuhamy V. Wijesinghe

1948 Present: Basnayake J.
 
PUNCHIAPPUHAMY, Appellant, and WIJESINGHE (Excise Inspector), Respondent.
 
S. C. 1,491.-M. C. Galle, 7,044.

     Criminal Procedure Code-Plea of guilt-Tendered by proctor-Conviction irregular- Section 188.
 
A plea of guilt must be tendered by the accused himself. The accused, cannot be convicted on a plea of guilt tendered by his proctor.
 
APPEAL from a judgment of the Magistrate, Galle.

W. H. Wickremesinghe, for accused appellant.

A. C. Alles, Crown Counsel, for the Attorney-General.
 
February 5, 1948. BASNAYAKE J.-
 
At the conclusion of the trial of this case, the proctor who appeared for the two accused tendered a plea of " guilty " on behalf of the first accused. The prosecution then with the permission of the learned Magistrate withdrew the charge against the second accused. It is now urged on behalf of the first accused that the proctor had no authority to withdraw his previous plea of " not guilty " and tender a plea of " guilty " and that the conviction cannot therefore stand.
 
The contention of counsel is entitled to succeed. Section 188 of the Criminal Procedure Code makes no provision

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top