APPUSINGHO et al. v. VAN BUREN
1948 Present :
Basnayake J.
APPUSINGHO et al., Appellants, and VAN BUREN (Excise
Inspector), Respondent.
S. C. 911-914-M. C. Chilaw, 33,861.
Penal Code, sections 183, 220a,
344-Obstruction to Public Servant-Arrest without warrant-Record of grounds of
belief-Condition precedent-Poisons, Opium and Dangerous Drugs Ordinance, section
75.
An Excise officer has no power to arrest a person who commits an offence under
the Poisons, Opium and Dangerous Drugs Ordinance unless he either has a warrant
or makes the record specified by section 75 (2) of that Ordinance. An arrest
otherwise made is illegal and resistance to it is not an offence.
APPEAL
from a judgment of the Magistrate, Chilaw.
G. E. Chitty, with Cecil Wijeratne, for the accused, appellants.
V. T. Thamotheram, Crown Counsel, for the Attorney-General.
Cur. adv. vult.
March 24, 1948.
Basnayake J.-
The four accused-appellants were tried and convicted of offences punishable
under sections 183, 220a and 344 of the Penal Code. The first and fourth
appellants were each fined Rs. 50 under section 220a, the second and third
appellants were each fined Rs. 25 in respect of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.