SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

GIVENDRASINGHA v. DE MEL R.F.S.


Givendrasingha V. De Mel, R.F.S.

1948 Present : Basnayake J.
 
GIVENDRASINGHA,
Petitioner, and R. F. S. DE MEL,
Respondent.
 
In the Matter of an Application for a Writ of Quo WarRanto.

Writ of Quo Warranto-Municipal Council-Election of Mayor-Propose disqualified but Councilor de facto-Validity of election-No. objection taken- Acquiescence-Discretion of Court-Municipal Councils Ordinance, No. 29 of 1947-Section 14 (3).
 
The respondent was proposed for election as Mayor of Colombo by one G who at the time was disqualified from sitting or voting as a Councilor but did in fact sit and vote as such. On an application for a writ of Quo Warranto-
 
Held (i) that the provisions of section 14 (3) of the Municipal Councils Ordinance, No. 29 of 1947, were imperative and that the candidate had to be proposed and seconded ;
 
(ii) that the requirement is satisfied if the proposal is made by a Councilor de facto ;
 
(iii) that the writ being discretionary will not be granted where the petitioner had acquiesced in the election.

APPLICATION for a writ of quo warranto on the Mayor of the Colombo Municipal Council.
 
E. B. Wikramanayake, with M. A. M. Hussain, for the petit







































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top