SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

VALLIPURAM v. POSTMASTER GENERAL
NLR50V214



Vallipuram V. Postmaster General

1948     Present: Gratiaen J.

VALLIPURAM, Petitioner, and POSTMASTER-GENERAL,
Respondent.

S. C, 502-In the matter of an Application for a Writ of Mandamus on
the Postmaster-General

Writ of Mandamus-Dismissal of public officer-Pleasure of Crown-Inquiry into charges-Irregularity-Ceylon (State Council) Order in Council 1931-Section 86 (1)-Royal instructions.

The effect of Article 86 of the Ceylon (State Council) Order in Council, 1931, is that all public servants in Ceylon hold office during the pleasure of the Crown subject to any specific law to the contrary.

The Royal instructions regulating the procedure for dismissal are issued merely for the direction of the Governor and do not constitute a contract between the Crown and its servants.

APPLICATION for a writ of mandamus on the Postmaster-General.

E. B. Wikramanayake, K. C.,
with A. Sivagurunathan, for the petitioner.

Cur. adv. vult.

December 1, 1948. GRATIAEN J.-

The petitioner was a Postmaster employed as an officer of the Ceylon Post and Telegraph Department. On June 21, 1945, by an order of the Governor, he was dismissed from the Public Service. Thereafter he unsuccessfully sought through various channels to obtain redress and on October 29 of this year (40 months after the event) he applies to this Court for relief. It is not pretended that he has any other object in view than to challenge the legality of his dismissal and thereby to secure his reinstatement as a public servant. He complains that he was not given the fullest opportunity of exculpating himself in respect of the charges framed against him, and that in particular he was not permitted to cross-examine witnesses or to have access to documents used against him. In these alleged circumstances he asks this Court for a writ of mandamus " ordering the Postmaster-General of Ceylon to hold an inquiry into the charges framed against him ".

On the date of the petitioner's dismissal Ceylon was a Crown Colony and in terms of Article 86 (1) of the Ceylon (State Council) Order in Council, 1931, the appointment, promotion, transfer, dismissal and disciplinary control of public officers in the Colony vested in the Governor subject (as far as is relevant to this present application) to any instructions given under the Royal Sign Manual and Signet. Article 86 (2) conferred in the Governor a limited right to delegate his powers in this connection. It is expressly laid down in the Royal Instructions to the Governor dated December 6, 1941, that, inter alia, " all commissions granted by the Governor or by any public officer acting under his authority shall, unless otherwise provided by law, be granted during Our pleasure only ". The Royal Instructions also lay down the procedure to be followed before the Governor proceeds to dismiss different grades of public officer. In the case of any officer in the grade to which the petitioner belongs, " the grounds of intended dismissal shall be definitely stated in writing and communicated to him in order that he may have full opportunity of exculpating himself, and the Governor shall investigate the case wit



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top