[IN THE PRIVY COUNCIL]
SIMONDS, NORMAND, OAKSEY, MACDERMOTT, MADHAVAN NAIR, JJ
KING – Appellant
Versus
CASPERSZ – Respondent
No. 2 or 1948
L. M. D. de Silva, K.C., with R. K. Handoo, for the appellant.
Sir David Maxwell Fyfe, K.C., with Frank Gahan; for the Crown.
[IN
THE PRIVY COUNCIL]
1948 Present: Lord Simonds, Lord Normand,
Lord Oaksey, Lord MacDermott;
Sir Madhavan Nair
THE KING v. CASPERSZ PRIVY
COUNCIL APPEAL,
No.
2 or 1948
S. C. 129-D.
C. (Criminal) Trincomalee, 293.
Penal
Code-Criminal breach of trust-Intention to cause wrongful gain or wrongful
loss-Motive not relevant-Sections 21, 22, 388 and 392.
Accused, an executive engineer, was put in charge of work on a
road which was of great urgency and in which speed was more important than
cost. Complaints were made by the overseers that they were losing money on the
work for the reason that they had to pay their labourers more than they were
getting from the Public Works Department. In order to placate the overseers the
accused instructed them to insert items in their bills for work which was not
done, and made payments accordingly.
Held, that the accused was guilty of criminal
breach of trust. The fact that the
accused may have thought that he was acting
in the interests of the country was relevant only on the question of sentence.
APPEAL
from a judgment of the Supreme Court reported in (1946 47 N. L. R. 165).
L. M. D. de Silva, K.C., with R. K. Handoo, for the appellant.
Sir David
Maxwell Fyfe, K.C., with Frank Gahan; for the Crown.
June 2, 1948. Delivered by LORD OAKSEY.-
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme
Court of Ceylon dated March 7, 1946, which affirmed the conviction of
the appellant by the District Court of Trincomalee on November 13, 1945, but
substituted for a sentence of six months' rigorous imprisonment a fine of Rs.
500 and imprisonment till the rising of the Court. The appellant paid the fine
and served the sentence of imprisonment.
At the conclusion of the arguments their Lordships
announced that they would humbly advise His Majesty that the appeal should be
dismissed, and they now state their reasons.
The charge against the appellant was that between
April 10 and May 19, 1944, he, being entrusted as executive engineer at
Trincomalee of the Public Works Department with money to pay overseers for
rubble
bottoming on specified parts of the
Trincomalee-Batticaloa road, committed a criminal breach of trust in respect of
Rs. 6,218.48 out of such money.
The charge was under section 392 of the Penal Code
and the following sections of the Code are material :-
" 21.-(1) ' Wrongful gain ' is gain by unlawful
means of property to which the person gaining is not legally entitled.
(2) ' Wrongful loss ' is the loss by unlawful means
of property to which the person losing it is legally entitled.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . .
22. Whoever does anything with the intention of
causing wrongful gain to one person, or wrongful loss to another person, is
said to do that thing ' dishonestly '.
388. Whoever, being in any manner entrusted with
property, or with any dominion over property, dishonestly misappropriates or
converts to his own use that property, or dishonestly uses or disposes of that
property in violation of any direction of law prescribing the mode in which
such trust