SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HOWARD, CJ
GEERIS APPU – Appellant
Versus
SEYDEEN – Respondent


Advocates:
K. C. de Silva, for accused appellant.
Arthur Keuneman, Grown Counsel, for the Attorney-General.

Geeris Appu V. Seydeen

1948     Present; Howard C.J.

 GEERIS APPU, Appellant, and SEYDEEN, P. S. 262.
Respondent

S. C. 253-M. C. Balapitiya, 60,121

Grievous hurt-Incised wound caused by sharp weapon-Piece of bone chipped off-Penal Code, s. 311.

An incised wound cutting into the bone and chipping off a piece of the bone is grievous hurt within

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top