HOWARD, CJ
GEERIS APPU – Appellant
Versus
SEYDEEN – Respondent
Advocates:
K. C. de Silva, for accused appellant.
Arthur Keuneman, Grown Counsel, for the Attorney-General.
|
Geeris Appu V. Seydeen
1948 Present; Howard
C.J.
GEERIS APPU, Appellant, and SEYDEEN, P. S.
262.
Respondent
S. C. 253-M. C. Balapitiya, 60,121
Grievous
hurt-Incised wound caused by sharp weapon-Piece of bone chipped off-Penal Code,
s. 311.
An incised wound cutting into the bone and chipping off a piece of
the bone is grievous hurt within
|
Click Here to Read the rest of this document