SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DE SILVA G.E. v. ATTORNEY GENERAL et al.
NLR50V481



De Silva, G.E. V. Attorney General Et Al.,

[IN THE PRIVY COUNCIL]

1919 Present : Lord Simonds, Lord du Parcq and Lord Normand

G. E. DE SILVA, Petitioner, and ATTORNEY-GENERAL et al.,
Respondents

 APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL TO THE
PRIVY COUNCIL


Election Petitions Nos. 4 and 5 of 1947

Privy Council-Election petition-Special leave to appeal-Determination of Election Court is final-No appeal to Privy Council-Parliamentary Elections Order in Council, 1946-Sections 75, 81 and 82.

No appeal will be entertained by the Privy Council from an order of an Election Judge under Section 81 of the Parliamentary (Elections) Order in Council, 1946.

APPLICATION for special leave to appeal to the Privy Council from an order of the Election Judge in Election Petitions Nos. 4 and 5 of 1947. The order of the Election Judge is reported in (1948) 49 N. L. R. 169.

Sir Valentine Holmes, K.C., with R. K. Handoo, for the petitioner.

Frank Grahan
for the Attorney General.

April 11, 1949. Delivered by LORD SIMONDS-

Their Lordships have humbly advised His Majesty that in their opinion this petition for special leave to appeal should be refused with costs. These are their reasons.

The petitioner George Edmund de Silva prays for special leave to appeal from a determination of Windham J., a Judge of the Supreme Court of the Island of Ceylon acting as Election Judge under the provisions of the Order in Council hereafter mentioned, whereby the election of the petitioner as member of the House of Representatives for the Kandy Electoral District was declared to be void for certain reasons into which it is unnecessary to enter. When their Lordships had partially considered the case 011 its merits, it appeared that a question of jurisdiction arose upon which they desired the assistance of Counsel for the Attorney-General of Ceylon. Having now heard full argument upon the question

they are satisfied that the matter in dispute is one in which the Prerogative right to entertain an appeal does not exist and that the petition must be refused accordingly.

By an Order in Council called the Ceylon (Parliamentary Elections) Order in Council, 1946, which was made under the authority of the Ceylon (Constitution) Order in Council, 1946, provision was made for the election of' members' to serve in the House of Representatives for Ceylon. The said Order in Council after making all the usual and appropriate provisions in regard to qualification of electors and the holding of elections and other relevant matters and having defined corrupt practices and prescribed that every person who should be guilty of a corrupt practice should on conviction be liable to certain penalties, by s. 76 enacted that the election of a candidate as a member should be avoided by his conviction for any corrupt or illegal practice, and by s. 77 that the election of a candidate as a member should be declared to be void on an election petition on any of a number of grounds therein stated which might be proved to the Satisfaction of the election judge. Part V of the Order deals with Election Petitions. By section 75 (1) it is provided that every







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top