GRATIAEN, J
IN RE ATHURUPANE
1959 Present
: Gratiaen J.
In re ATHURUPANE
S. C. 457-In revision M. C. Panadure, 8,977
Criminal Procedure
Code-Postponement of proceedings-Rules for remanding accused-Bail-Judicial
discretion-Cautious exercise necessary Sections 289 (2) and (4), 396.
Where an accused person is remanded for a term not exceeding the period
prescribed in section 289 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code it; is essential
that he should be produced in Court at the expiry of that term so that the
Magistrate might bring his mind to bear once more on what would be the
appropriate order to make should the inquiry or trial be postponed.
The fixing of bail calls for the exercise of judicial discretion and for-the
most anxious care in each case.
ORDER
made in revision in respect of certain orders of the Magistrate, Panadure.
Accused present in person.
R. A. Kannangara, Crown Counsel, for Attorney-General.
September 27, 1949. GRATIAEN J.-
This case was brought to my notice when I recently visited the remand jail at
Welikade. It was then reported to me that the accused one Reginald Athurupane,
a young lad of 17, has since June 27,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.