SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

VANDER POORTEN v. VANDER POORTEN et al.


Vander Poorten V. Vander Poorten Et Al.,

.

145


1949 Present : Wijeyewardene C.J. and Gunasekera J.

VANDER POORTEN, Applicant, and VANDER POORTEN
et al., Respondents

S, C. 172-APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL LEAVE TO APPEAL TO THE PRIVY COUNCIL IN S. C. 496, D. C. KANDY, 1,656/M.E-

Privy Council-Application for leave to appeal-Computation of amount in respect of which appeal. lies as of right-Ground of appeal stated in notice to opposite party-Can it be altered subsequently ?-Notice given by attorney of applicant-Is it valid ?-Appeals (Privy Council) Ordinance (Cap. 85), Schedule, Rules 1 and 2-Appellate Procedure (Privy Council) Order, 1921, Rules 5, 6 and 19.

Plaintiffs, as beneficiaries under a last will, obtained judgment against , the defendant for a sum of Rs. 1,000 as their share of a fund of Rs. 10,000 Defendant, however, sought to appeal to the Privy Council as of right on the ground that in view of the decree entered against him he was exposed to the risk of claims being made against him by the other beneficiaries trying to recover their shares of the Rs. 10,000.

Held, that the matter in dispute on the appeal did not involve a claim of the value of Rs























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top