ISMAIL LEBBE v. HANIFFA
1949 Present : Nagalingam J.
and Windham J.
ISMAIL LEBBE, Appellant, and HANIFFA, Respondent
S. C. 313-D. C. Kegalla, 4,048
Partition-Muslim
co-owners-Application of Roman-Dutch law of succession- Duty of Judge.
Where the co-owners of a land are Muslims governed by the Muslim system of
jurisprudence, the Judge should apply the Muslim law of intestate succession and
not the Roman-Dutch Law.
APPEAL
from a judgment of the District Court, Kegalla.
M. H. A. Aziz, for fourth defendant appellant.
H. W. Jayewardene, with T. B. Dissanayake, for first and second
defendants respondents.
C. E. S. Perera, with C. Seneviratne, for third defendant
respondent.
Cur. adv. vult.
April 4, 1949. NAGALINGAM J.-
This is an action to partition a land the co-owners of which are Muslims
governed by the Muslim system of jurisprudence. The contention put forward on
behalf of the fourth defendant-appellant is that the learned Judge has failed to
appreciate the Muslim. Law of intestate succession and has proceeded to apply
the Roman-Dutch Law. This contention appears to be sound.
Counsel for the other respondents sought to seek an avenue of escape from thi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.