SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ISMAIL LEBBE v. HANIFFA


Ismail Lebbe V. Haniffa

1949 Present : Nagalingam J. and Windham J.

ISMAIL LEBBE, Appellant, and HANIFFA, Respondent

S. C. 313-D. C. Kegalla, 4,048

 Partition-Muslim co-owners-Application of Roman-Dutch law of succession- Duty of Judge.

Where the co-owners of a land are Muslims governed by the Muslim system of jurisprudence, the Judge should apply the Muslim law of intestate succession and not the Roman-Dutch Law.

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court, Kegalla.

M. H. A. Aziz, for fourth defendant appellant.

H. W. Jayewardene, with T. B. Dissanayake, for first and second defendants respondents.

C. E. S. Perera, with C. Seneviratne, for third defendant respondent.

Cur. adv. vult.

April 4, 1949. NAGALINGAM J.-

This is an action to partition a land the co-owners of which are Muslims governed by the Muslim system of jurisprudence. The contention put forward on behalf of the fourth defendant-appellant is that the learned Judge has failed to appreciate the Muslim. Law of intestate succession and has proceeded to apply the Roman-Dutch Law. This contention appears to be sound.

Counsel for the other respondents sought to seek an avenue of escape from thi






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top