THEVCHANAMOORTHY et al. v. APPAKUDDY et al.
1950 Present : Jayetileke
S.P.J. and Gunasekara J.
THEVCHANAMOORTHY et al, Appellants, and APPAKUDDY et al.,
Respondents
S. C. 393-D. C. Jaffna, 1,159
Partition Ordinance-Section
6-Commissioner's scheme of partition-Re-issue of commission to Commissioner to
submit a fresh scheme-Return of commission-Duty of Court to issue notice to all
parties again-Co-owner's right to be allotted portion which contains his
improvements.
Where, in a partition action, a second scheme of partition is ordered notice
should be given to the parties of the day on which the second scheme will be
considered by the Court. The notice which the Court has to give to the parties
in terms of section 6 of the Partition Ordinance cannot be restricted to the day
fixed for the consideration of the original scheme of partition proposed by the
Commissioner.
A co-owner should be allotted the portion which contains his improvements
whenever it is possible to do so.
APPEAL
from a judgment of the District Court, Jaffna.
S. J. V. Chelvanayagam, K.C., with S. Thangarajah, for the 13th to 16th
defendants appellants.
H. W. Tambiah, with A. Nagendra, for
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.