SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BISO MENIKA v. PUNCHIAMMA


Biso Menika V. Punchiamma

1949 Present: Windham J. and Gratiaen J.

BISO MENIKA et al., Appellants, and PUNCHIAMMA et al,
Respondents

S. C. 294-D. C. Matale, L 125

Kandyan Law-Deed of. gift in consideration of marriage-Revocability-Kandyan Law Declaration and Amendment Ordinance, No. 39 of 1938-Sections 4 (1) and 5 (1) (b)-Meaning of " expressed to be in consideration of a future marriage ".

A deed of gift in consideration of marriage, to be irrevocable in terms of section 5 (1) (6) of the Kandyan Law Declaration and Amendment Ordinance, No. 39 of 1938, must not only be proved to be in consideration of a future marriage, but must also be " expressed to be " in consideration of a future marriage. The deed of gift must state expressly, and not merely use words from which the inference might or even must be drawn, that the gift is in. consideration of a future marriage.

A
PPEAL from a judgment of the District Court, Matale. Vernon Wijetunge, for plaintiffs appellants.

B. S. C. Ratwatte, for defendant respondents.

Cur. adv. vult.

October 31, 1949. WINDHAM J.-

This appeal raises a question regarding the proper interpretation to be placed on paragraph (b) of secti























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top