BISO MENIKA v. PUNCHIAMMA
1949 Present: Windham J. and
Gratiaen J.
BISO MENIKA et al., Appellants, and PUNCHIAMMA et al,
Respondents
S. C. 294-D. C. Matale, L 125
Kandyan Law-Deed of. gift in
consideration of marriage-Revocability-Kandyan Law Declaration and Amendment
Ordinance, No. 39 of 1938-Sections 4 (1) and 5 (1) (b)-Meaning of " expressed to
be in consideration of a future marriage ".
A deed of gift in consideration of marriage, to be irrevocable in terms of
section 5 (1) (6) of the Kandyan Law Declaration and Amendment Ordinance, No. 39
of 1938, must not only be proved to be in consideration of a future marriage,
but must also be " expressed to be " in consideration of a future marriage. The
deed of gift must state expressly, and not merely use words from which the
inference might or even must be drawn, that the gift is in. consideration of a
future marriage.
APPEAL from a judgment of the District
Court, Matale. Vernon Wijetunge, for plaintiffs appellants.
B. S. C. Ratwatte, for defendant respondents.
Cur. adv. vult.
October 31, 1949. WINDHAM J.-
This appeal raises a question regarding the proper interpretation to be
placed on paragraph (b) of secti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.