SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DIAS v. PERIES


Dias V. Peries

1950 Present: Jayetileke C.J. and Swan J.

DIAS,
Appellant, and PERIES, Respondent

S. C. 537-D. C. Mannar, 10,457

Rent Restriction Act, No. 89 of 1948-Sections 1 and 8--Prohibition of excessive advance of rent-Scope of such prohibition.

Rent Restriction Ordinance, No. 60 of 1942-Authorised rent-Section 3-Meaning of " any period ".

(i) The provision in section 8 of the Rent Restriction Act, No. 29 of 1948, that a landlord cannot retain in his hands, as an advance of rent, any amount exceeding the authorised rent for a period of three months is not applicable to an advance of rent received under a contract of tenancy entered into prior to the date of commencement of the operation of the Act, viz., January 1, 1949.

(ii) Where an indenture of lease, which was entered into a few months before the Rent Restriction Ordinance, No. 6Q of 1942, came into operation, provided that the yearly rental should be paid in monthly instalments-

Held, that the provisions of section 3 would be applicable in respect of the period of the lease subsequent to the date when the Ordinance came into operation and the lessor, therefore, was not entitled to recover any re









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top