SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

FERNANDOPULLE v. PERERA APPUHAMY


Fernandopulle V. Perera Appuhamy

1950 Present : Jayetileke C.J. and Nagalingam J.

FERNANDOPULLE,
Appellant, and PERERA APPUHAMY,

Respondent

S. C. 172-D. C. Negombo, 15,385

Debt Conciliation Ordinance, No. 39 of 1941-Meaning of " debtor "-" Mortgage " does not include " Moratuwa mortgage "-Matter pending before Debt Conciliation Board-Bar of civil actions-Sections 32, 36, 56.

Where there was a transfer of property with an undertaking to re-sell it within a specified time, and the transferor continued to be in possession of the property-

Held, that the transaction was not in form a mortgage or charge over property and could not, therefore, be the subject-matter of proceedings before the Debt Conciliation Board. The term " mortgage or charge " in Ceylon cannot be said to include transactions called " Moratuwa mortgages " which are the local equivalent of the English and Indian mortgages.

Held further, (i) that section 56 (a) (ii) of the Debt Conciliation Ordinance could not prevent a proceeding held before the Debt Conciliation Board from being declared by a Court of Law as invalid for want of jurisdiction.

(ii) that the Debt Conciliation Board had no power



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top