SIVAGURUNATHAN v. DORESAMY et al.
1951 Present: Basnayake
J. and Pulle J.
SIVAGURUNATHAN, Appellant, and DORESAMY et al.,
Respondents
S. C. 13-D. C. Colombo 4,707/P.
Appeal-Notice of tendering
security-Failure to observe proper form-Fatal irregularity-Abatement of
appeal-Objection can be taken in Appeal Court-Civil Procedure Code, Section 756
and Form No: 126 in Schedule 1.
The appellant in a partition action served notice of tendering of security on
all the respondents to the appeal. In the case of the 7th respondent, however,
the notice which was served on her did not include her among those in respect of
whose costs the appellant proposed to give security.
Held, that although the bond executed by the appellant secured the costs of all
the respondents to the appeal, including the 7th respondent, the omission to
give the prescribed notice was a fatal irregularity. A notice of tendering
security should inform the respondent on whom it is served that security for
that respondent's costs will be tendered.
A Schedule in a Statute is as much a part of the statute and as much an
enactment as any other part. The notice of tendering security required by
secti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.