DON AMARASEKERA v. RASIAH
1950 Present .
Nagalingam J.
DON AMARASEKERA, Petitioner, and RASIAH, Respondent
S. C-96 Application for a Writ of Mandamus on E. Rasiah
Local Option Rules-Rule
21-Manner in which ballot paper should be marked- Construction of words " in the
space provided ".
Where a poll is held for the closure of taverns, a cross made on the reverse
side of the ballot paper and not on the face of it cannot be held to comply with
Rule 21 of the Local Option Rules. A ballot paper marked in this manner will
therefore, be rejected, although in the ballot paper itself there is a direction
to the voter to mark the cross " below ".
APPLICATION
for a writ of mandamus in respect of a poll for the closure of a tavern
L. G. Weeramantry, for the petitioner.
Cur. adv. vult.
June 1, 1950. NAGALINGAM J.-
The question for determination in this case is whether the Presiding Officer was
correct in rejecting certain ballot papers which were marked with a cross not on
the face of the ballot paper but on its reverse. It has been contended that it
is immaterial where the mark appears on the ballot paper so long as the
intention of the voter can be gathered from the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.