IN RE VELIN et al.
1951 Present: Gratiaen
J.
IN RE VELIN et al.
In revision under Section 356 of Criminal Procedure. Code
M. C. Matugama, 11,984; M. C.
Balangoda, 24,590; M. C. Avissawella, 53,121; M. C. Kalutara, 10,325; M. C.
Gampaha, 179; M. C. Colombo, 6,203; M. M. C. Colombo, 81,462.
Sentence-Payment of Fines (Courts of Summary Jurisdiction) Ordinance, No. 49 of
1938-Purposes for which it was designed-Sentence of fine in first instance-
Duties of sentencing Court-Sections 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8-Criminal Procedure Code, s.
312 (4) (c).
Where an offender is sentenced only to pay a fine, a Court of summary
jurisdiction must comply with the following imperative provisions of the Payment
of fines (Courts of Summary Jurisdiction) Ordinance, No. 49 of 1938: -
(a) The means of the offender must, among other considerations, be taken into
account in fixing the amount of the fine (Section 2).
(b) Unless special circumstances (the nature of which must be recorded in the
proceedings) are proved or admitted to exist, at least seven days time must be
given for the payment of the fine the grant of further extensions of time is
permissible (Section 3); an order, therefore
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.