SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

KUMARAJEEVA v. SUSANA FERNANDO et al.


Kumarajeeva V. Susana Fernando Et Al.,

1950 Present : Nagalingam J. and Swan J.

KUMARAJEEVA,
Appellant, and SUSANA FERNANDO et al.,

Respondents

S. C. 23-D. C. (
Inty.) Negombo, 3,493

 Will-Probate-Right of executor is paramount.

The Court cannot refuse to grant the probate of a will to a person appointed executor on the ground of refusal by the executor to include certain disputed moneys as forming part of the estate.

APPEAL from an order of the District Court, Negombo.

N. E. Weerasooria, K.C., with C. V. Ranawake, for the petitioner appellant.

H. V. Perera, K.C., with E. G. Wikramanayake, K.C., and Vernon Wijetunge, for the 3rd respondent.

Cur. adv. vult.

 December 11, 1950. NAGALINGAM J.-

This is an appeal from an order of the learned District Judge of Negombo granting letters of administration with the will annexed to the 3rd respondent, in preference to the claim of the petitioner who is the executor named in the will.

That the Court has the power to pass over an executor for good reason is a proposition that must necessarily flow from the Divisional Bench judgment of this Court in Setukavalar v. Alvapillai 1[ (1934) 36 N. L. R. 281.] by reason of





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top