SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

CHELLAPPAH v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX


Chellappah V. Commissioner Of IncomeTax

1951 Present: Basnayake J.

CHELLAPPAH,
Appellant, and COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, Respondent

S. C. 1,260-M. C. Colombo, 5,317/A

Income Tax Ordinance-Omission of income from return-Making false statement or entry in return-Prosecution under section 87 (1)-" Wilfully with intent to evade tax "-Meaning of words " wilfully " and " evade "-Excess Profits Duty Ordinance, No. 38 of 1941, s. 12 (5).

In a prosecution under section 87 (1) of the Income Tax Ordinance-

(i) the burden is on the Crown to prove that the accused " wilfully with intent to evade tax " committed any one of the acts specified in the section.

(ii) the word " wilfully " should be construed as meaning deliberately or purposely with the evil intent of committing the act or acts enumerated in the section.

(iii) the word " evade " must be understood not in the innocuous sense of avoid tax by taking advantage of the statute, but in the sense of unlawfully escape or avoid by fraud, misrepresentation or underhand contrivance.

(IV) the omission from a return of any income does not constitute an offence unless it is done deliberately and with evil intention of de














































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top