CHELLAPPAH v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX
1951 Present: Basnayake
J.
CHELLAPPAH, Appellant, and COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, Respondent
S. C. 1,260-M. C. Colombo, 5,317/A
Income Tax Ordinance-Omission of
income from return-Making false statement or entry in return-Prosecution under
section 87 (1)-" Wilfully with intent to evade tax "-Meaning of words " wilfully
" and " evade "-Excess Profits Duty Ordinance, No. 38 of 1941, s. 12 (5).
In a prosecution under section 87 (1) of the Income Tax Ordinance-
(i) the burden is on the Crown to prove that the accused " wilfully with intent
to evade tax " committed any one of the acts specified in the section.
(ii) the word " wilfully " should be construed as meaning deliberately or
purposely with the evil intent of committing the act or acts enumerated in the
section.
(iii) the word " evade " must be understood not in the innocuous sense of avoid
tax by taking advantage of the statute, but in the sense of unlawfully escape or
avoid by fraud, misrepresentation or underhand contrivance.
(IV) the omission from a return of any income does not constitute an offence
unless it is done deliberately and with evil intention of de
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.