SUDU BANDA v. PUNCHIRALA
1951 Present: Dias
S.P.J. and Gunasekara J.
SUDU BANDA, Appellant, and PUNCHIRALA, Respondent
S. C. 323-D. C. Badullu 8,969
Injuria-Mediate injury-Defamation
of wife-Right of husband to sue.
Under the law of Ceylon a defamatory statement about the honour or chastity of a
wife is an injury to the husband and gives him a cause of action. Appuhamy v.
Kirihami (1895) 1 N. L .R. 83 distinguished.
APPEAL
from a judgment of the District Court, Badulla.
E. B. Wikramanayake, K.C., with N. Kumarasingham, for the plaintiff appellant.
Cyril E. S. Perera, with M. A. M. Hussein, for the defendant respondent.
Cur. adv. vult.
May 23, 1951. DIAS
S.P.J.-
This case raises an important and interesting question of Roman Dutch Law. The
defendant is alleged to have stated in a petition addressed to the Education
Department that Bandaramenika, who is the married wife of the
plaintiff-appellant, was living in terms of illicit intimacy, or was committing
adultery with one P. T. M. K. Banda, an assistant teacher in a government
school. The lady instituted action against the defendant and recovered damages
for the injury caused to her reputation. In the pr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.