SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SUDU BANDA v. PUNCHIRALA


Sudu Banda V. Punchirala

1951 Present: Dias S.P.J. and Gunasekara J.

SUDU BANDA,
Appellant, and PUNCHIRALA, Respondent

S. C. 323-D. C. Badullu 8,969

Injuria-Mediate injury-Defamation of wife-Right of husband to sue.

Under the law of Ceylon a defamatory statement about the honour or chastity of a wife is an injury to the husband and gives him a cause of action. Appuhamy v. Kirihami (1895) 1 N. L .R. 83 distinguished.

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court, Badulla.

E. B. Wikramanayake, K.C., with N. Kumarasingham, for the plaintiff appellant.

Cyril E. S. Perera, with M. A. M. Hussein, for the defendant respondent.

Cur. adv. vult.

 May 23, 1951. DIAS S.P.J.-

This case raises an important and interesting question of Roman Dutch Law. The defendant is alleged to have stated in a petition addressed to the Education Department that Bandaramenika, who is the married wife of the plaintiff-appellant, was living in terms of illicit intimacy, or was committing adultery with one P. T. M. K. Banda, an assistant teacher in a government school. The lady instituted action against the defendant and recovered damages for the injury caused to her reputation. In the pr

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top