KING v. MICHAEL FERNANDO
[ASSIZE COURT]
1951 Present . Gratiaen J.
THE KING v. MICHAEL FERNANDO
S. C. 45-M. C. Kanadulla, 4,124 /4,125
Criminal procedure-Joinder of
charges-Two offences of same kind committed within a. year-Separate non-summary
proceedings and committals-Subsequent joinder of charges in the same
indictment-Propriety of such procedure-Separate trials for counts in same
indictment-When permissible-Indictments Act, 1915, of England, s. 5
(3)-Indictment-Improper committal on insufficient evidence-Amendment of
indictment to supply vital gaps-Not permissible Criminal Procedure Code, ss.
172, 179.
Separate and distinct non-summary proceedings were conducted against the accused
in respect of two offences of the same kind committed within twelve months and
the accused was committed for trial in the Supreme Court in each case.
Subsequently a single indictment was presented to the Supreme Court in the name
of the Attorney-General charging the accused on two separate counts with the
commission of the respective offences which had been the subject of the separate
Magisterial inquiries.
Held that while it was not illegal for the Crown to join in the s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.