SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

KING v. MICHAEL FERNANDO


King V. Michael Fernando

[ASSIZE COURT]

1951 Present . Gratiaen J.

THE KING v. MICHAEL FERNANDO

S. C. 45-M. C. Kanadulla, 4,124 /4,125

Criminal procedure-Joinder of charges-Two offences of same kind committed within a. year-Separate non-summary proceedings and committals-Subsequent joinder of charges in the same indictment-Propriety of such procedure-Separate trials for counts in same indictment-When permissible-Indictments Act, 1915, of England, s. 5 (3)-Indictment-Improper committal on insufficient evidence-Amendment of indictment to supply vital gaps-Not permissible Criminal Procedure Code, ss. 172, 179.

Separate and distinct non-summary proceedings were conducted against the accused in respect of two offences of the same kind committed within twelve months and the accused was committed for trial in the Supreme Court in each case. Subsequently a single indictment was presented to the Supreme Court in the name of the Attorney-General charging the accused on two separate counts with the commission of the respective offences which had been the subject of the separate Magisterial inquiries.

Held that while it was not illegal for the Crown to join in the s













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top