SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SELLAPPAH v. SINNADURAI et al


Sellappah V. Sinnadurai Et Al

1951 Present: Nagalingam J., Basnayake J. and Swan J.

SELLAPPAH,
Appellant, and SINNADURAI et al., Respondents

S. C. 554-D. C, Point Pedro, 2,873

Thesavalamai-Jaffna Matrimonial Rights and Inheritance Ordinance (Cap. 48), ss. 6, 19 and 20-Thediatheddam-Retrospective operation of amending Ordinance, No. 58 of 1947-Interpretation Ordinance, (Cap. 2), s. 6 (2) and (3) (a).

Co-owners-Transfer, by a co-owner, of entirety of common property to stranger-Prescriptive possession by transferee-How computed.

Appeal-Case from District Court-Constitution of Appellate Court-Courts Ordinance (Cap. 6), ss. 38, 48 and 51.

Held (Basnayake J. dissenting) : (i) The amendment of sections 6 and 19 of the Jaffna Matrimonial Rights and Inheritance Ordinance (Cap. 48) by Ordinance No. 58 of 1947 has retrospective operation. The amending Ordinance was enacted in order to declare what the law always was and to restore the law as it stood before the decision in Avitchy Chettiar v. Rasamma (1933) 35 N. L. R. 313. Where, therefore, a woman, who married in 1917, purchased certain lands in 1918 with her dowry money during the subsistence of the marriage, suc

































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top