SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

MENDIS SINGHO v. ATTAPATTU


Mendis Singho V. Attapattu

1951 Present: Swan J.

MENDIS SINGHO,
Appellant, and ATTAPATTU
(Inspector of Police),
Respondent

S. C. 745-M. C. Gampaha, 56,845
 

Criminal Procedure Code, s. 152 (3)-Assumption of jurisdiction thereunder-Power of Court to try case de novo as Magistrate.

Once a Magistrate who is also a District Judge has assumed jurisdiction as a District Judge and tried a case in that capacity he should deliver judgment. He is not entitled to try the case de novo as Magistrate even though the offence in question is summarily triable by a Magistrate's Court.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Magistrate's Court, Gampaha.

Asoka Obeyesekera, with R. Wanasundera, for the accused

V. G. B. Perera, Crown Counsel, for the Attorney-General

Cur, adv. vult.

October 10, 1951. SWAN J.-

In this case the learned Magistrate has been guilty of an irregularity which, in my opinion, vitiates the entire proceedings. The charge was one of mischief under Section 412 of the Penal Code. The case first came up on August 21, 1950, before Mr. F. E. Alles, Magistrate of Gampaha. After recording the evidence of the chief witness for the prosecution, the learned Magistrate who







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top