NAIDE v. THE KING
[COURT or CRIMINAL APPEAL]
1951 Present: Nagalingam J. (President), Basnayake 3. and
Gunasekara J.
NAIDE, Appellant, and THE KING, Respondent.
APPEAL 58 OF 1951, WITH APPLICATION 84
S. C. 15-M. C. Kurunegala, 454.
Austin Jayasuriya for the accused
appellant.
T. S. Fernando, Crown Counsel, with Boyd Jayasuriya, Crown Counsel, for the
Crown.
Cur. adv. vult.
NAGALINGAM J.
The appellant in this case has been found guilty of the offence of murder and
has been sentenced to death. The only point raised at the hearing of this appeal
is that the accused has been prejudiced as a result of a misdirection in the
charge of the learned trial Judge.
It would be advantageous to set out very briefly the salient facts necessary for
a proper appreciation of the point debated at the Bar. The appellant made an
unsworn statement from the dock in the course of which he admitted having
stabbed the deceased woman, his sister-in-law. He also narrated the
circumstances under which he inflicted the injuries. He said that he had come
homo that morning from the field hungry and asked his sister-in-law for rice.
According to him, the deceased woman abused him sa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.