DHARMADASA v. THIEDEMAN
1950 Present: Nagalingam
J.
DHARMADASA, Appellant, and THIEDEMAN (Inspector of Police),
Respondent
S. C. 391-M. C. Gampola, 19,474
Soliciting-Meaning of
expression-Vagrants Ordinance (Cap. 26), s. 7 (1) (as).
The term " soliciting " in section 7 (1) (a) of the Vagrants Ordinance need not
necessarily be confined to cases where an appeal is made earnestly or is
pressed. It is wide enough to cover the case where a person is invited or even
where an offer is made coupled with not necessarily an express but an implied
invitation.
APPEAL
from a judgment of the Magistrate's Court, Gampola.
M. M Kumarakulasingham, with J. C. Thurairatnam, for accused appellant.
S. S. Wijesinha, Crown Counsel, for, the Attorney-General.
Cur, adv. vult.
July 11, 1965. NAGALINGAM J.-
The appellant in this case has been convicted by the learned Magistrate at
Gampola of having committed an offence under section 7 (1) (a) of the Vagrants
Ordinance (Cap. 26 of the Legislative Enactments) and sentenced to undergo a
term of three months' rigorous imprisonment. The only point that was pressed on
appeal was whether the facts testified to by the prosecution witnesses
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.