SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SUYAMBULINGAM CHETTIAR et al v. PECHCHI MUTTU CHETTIAR


Suyambulingam Chettiar Et Al V. Pechchi Muttu Chettiar

1952 Present: de Silva J,

SUYAMBULINGAM CHETTIAR, et al,
Appellants, and
 PECHCHI MUTTU CHETTIAR,
Respondent

S. C. 207-C. R. Colombo, 32,190

Rent Restriction Act, No. 29 of 1948-Section 13 (1) (a)-Rent in arrears-Tender of it before institution of action-Landlord's right to eject tenant.

Where, in a case of monthly tenancy, the tenant is in arrear of rent for one month after it has become due and the tenancy is thereafter terminated by due notice, the landlord's right to eject the tenant tinder section 13 (1) (a) of the Rent Restriction Act cannot be taken away from him by the tenant by tender of the arrears of rent before the institution of legal proceedings.

Fernando v. Samaraweera (1951) 52 N. L. R. 278 referred to.

George v. Richard (1948) 50 N. L. R. 128 not followed.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Court of Requests, Colombo.

H. W. Tambiah, for the plaintiffs appellants.

C. Chellappah, for the defendant respondent.

Cur. adv. vult.

April 3, 1952. DE SILVA J.-

This is an action for rent and ejectment. The defendant-respondent is the tenant of the plaintiffs-appellants of premises No. 40/53, St. J























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top