DE MEL v. DE MEL
1951 Present : Basnayake
J. and Pulle J.
DE MEL, Appellant, and DE MEL et al., Respondents
S. C. 277-D. C. Colombo, 1,250/D
Divorce-Malicious
desertion-Unfounded charge of adultery.
Where a husband suspected without reasonable grounds that his wife had
committed adultery and ordered her to leave the house and refused to be
reconciled to her unless she gave a written confession of adultery-
Held, that there was malicious desertion on the part of the husband.
APPEAL from a judgment of the
District Court, Colombo.
U. A. Jayasundera, K.C., with J. N. Fernandopulle, C. G. Weeramantry
and Felix Bahareti, for the plaintiff appellant.
H. V. Perera, K.C., with N. K. Choksy, K.C., and H. W.
Jayewardene, for the first defendant respondent.
N. E. Weerasooria, K.C., with W. D. Gunasekere, for the second
defendant respondent.
Cur. adv. vult.
June 28, 1951. PULLE J.-
This is an appeal in an action for dissolution of marriage instituted by the
husband on the ground that his wife, the first defendant, had committed adultery
with the second defendant from whom he claimed Rs. 10,000 as damages. The
defence was a denial and the wife counter-claimed a divorc
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.