SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DE MEL v. DE MEL


De Mel V. De Mel

1951 Present : Basnayake J. and Pulle J.

DE MEL,
Appellant, and DE MEL et al., Respondents

S. C. 277-D. C. Colombo, 1,250/D

Divorce-Malicious desertion-Unfounded charge of adultery.

Where a husband suspected without reasonable grounds that his wife had committed adultery and ordered her to leave the house and refused to be reconciled to her unless she gave a written confession of adultery-

Held, that there was malicious desertion on the part of the husband.

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court, Colombo.

U. A. Jayasundera, K.C., with J. N. Fernandopulle, C. G. Weeramantry and Felix Bahareti, for the plaintiff appellant.

H. V. Perera, K.C., with N. K. Choksy, K.C., and H. W. Jayewardene, for the first defendant respondent.

N. E. Weerasooria, K.C., with W. D. Gunasekere, for the second defendant respondent.

Cur. adv. vult.

June 28, 1951. PULLE J.-

This is an appeal in an action for dissolution of marriage instituted by the husband on the ground that his wife, the first defendant, had committed adultery with the second defendant from whom he claimed Rs. 10,000 as damages. The defence was a denial and the wife counter-claimed a divorc





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top