KANDIAH v. SARASWATHY
1951 Present : Dias
S.P.J. and Gunasekara J.
KANDIAH, Appellant, and SARASWATHY et al., Respondents
S. C. 288-D. C. Jaffna 4689M
Administration of estate-Right
of creditor to follow movable property sold by heir- Applicability of maxim
mobilia non habent sequelam-Thesavalamai- Applicability to a given case-Must be
specially pleaded-Civil Procedure Code, s. 154-Records of other actions not to
be admitted in bulk.
Quaere, whether the principle that a creditor of a deceased person's estate
may follow property alienated by an heir applies to movable property.
Per DIAS S.P.J.-There is no presumption of law by which a Court can say, without
proof, that the Thesavalamai applies to a particular Tamil who happens to reside
in the Jaffna Peninsula. In the absence of such a presumption the burden of
proof is on the party who contends that a special law has displaced the general
law in a given case to prove the applicability of such special law.
The requirement of section 154 of the Civil Procedure Code should be strictly
observed ; when relevant portions of the record of another action are admitted
in evidence each of them must be separately ma
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.