PEERIS v. SAVUNHAMY
1951 Present : Dias
S.P.J. and Gratiaen J.
PEERIS et al., Appellants, and SAVUNHAMY, Respondent.
S. C. 121-D. C. Chile, 2,596
Actio rei vindicatio-Burden of
proof-Boundaries--Statements in deeds between third parties--Evidentiary
value-Evidence Ordinance, s. 32-Finding of fact- Power of appellate Court to
reverse it.
Where, in an action for declaration of title to land, the defendant is in
possession of the land in dispute the burden is on the plaintiff to prove that
he has dominium.
For the purpose of identifying the land in dispute, statements of boundaries in
title deeds between third parties are not admissible under section 32 of the
Evidence Ordinance.
A finding of fact may be reversed on appeal if the trial Judge has demonstrably
misjudged the position.
APPEAL
from a judgment of the District Court,
Galle.
H. V. Perera, K.C., with H. W. Jayewardene and J. W. Subasinghe,
for the defendants appellants.
A. L. Jayasuriya, with E. A. G. de Silva, for the plaintiff
respondent.
Cur. adv. vult.
208
April 26, 1951. DIAS S.P.J.-
In this case the plaintiff seeks to vindicate title to an undivided 1/6th share
of a land which she calls
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.