SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PEERIS v. SAVUNHAMY


Peeris V. Savunhamy

1951 Present : Dias S.P.J. and Gratiaen J.

PEERIS et al.,
Appellants, and SAVUNHAMY, Respondent.

S. C. 121-D. C. Chile, 2,596

Actio rei vindicatio-Burden of proof-Boundaries--Statements in deeds between third parties--Evidentiary value-Evidence Ordinance, s. 32-Finding of fact- Power of appellate Court to reverse it.

Where, in an action for declaration of title to land, the defendant is in possession of the land in dispute the burden is on the plaintiff to prove that he has dominium.

For the purpose of identifying the land in dispute, statements of boundaries in title deeds between third parties are not admissible under section 32 of the Evidence Ordinance.

A finding of fact may be reversed on appeal if the trial Judge has demonstrably misjudged the position.

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court, Galle.

H. V. Perera, K.C., with H. W. Jayewardene and J. W. Subasinghe, for the defendants appellants.

A. L. Jayasuriya, with E. A. G. de Silva, for the plaintiff respondent.

Cur. adv. vult.

208

April 26, 1951. DIAS S.P.J.-

In this case the plaintiff seeks to vindicate title to an undivided 1/6th share of a land which she calls





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top