SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

NOORUL MUHEETHA v. SITTIE LEYAUDEEN


Noorul Muheetha V. Sittie Leyaudeen

[IN THE PRIVY COUNCIL]

1953
Present : Viscount Simon, Lord Morton of Henryton, Lord Cohen and Sir Lionel Leach

NOORUL MUHEETHA,
Appellant, and SITTIE LEYAUDEEN et al., Respondents

PRIVY COUNCIL APPEAL No. 38 OF 1951

S. C. 374-D. C. Colombo, 2,997

Muslim law-Fideicommissum-Donation to minors-Acceptance by widowed mother-Validity-Applicability of Roman-Dutch law.

Where a fideicommissum in respect of immovable property was created by a deed of gift between Muslims and, the donees being minors, the gift was accepted on their behalf by their mother, who was a widow-

Held, (i) that the law applicable in determining the authority of the mother to accept the gift on behalf of her infant children was the Muslim law and not Roman-Dutch law.

Weerasekera v. Peiris (1933) 34 N. L. R. 2S1, distinguished.

(ii) that under the Muslim law as received in Ceylon, and in the circumstances of the particular case, the mother had the necessary authority to accept the gift.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Supreme Court reported in (1950) 51 N. L. R. 509.

Phineas Quass, Q.C., with Dingle Foot and S. Canagarayar, for the defendant appellant.

St



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top