SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

CEYLON TEXTILES LTD. v. CHITTAMPALAM GARDINER


Ceylon Textiles Ltd. V. Chittampalam Gardiner

1952 Present : Pulle J. and L. M. D. de Silva J.

CEYLON TEXTILES LTD. et al,
Appellants, and CHITTAMPALAM
GARDINER et al,
Respondents

S. C. 504-D. C. Colombo, 365/S

Companies Ordinance, No. 51 of 1938-Section 162 (6)-Public Company-Winding up by Court-Deadlock-Perverse use of voting power-" Just and equitable cause "-Scope of functions of Court.

Where an application to Court was made under section 162 (6) of the Companies Ordinance for the winding up of a public company on the ground of a deadlock in the management and conduct of the company's affairs owing to disputes between the directors and the agents and secretaries of the company and between the directors inter se-

Held, that the constitution of a public company generally made it possible for disputes to be resolved in a domestic forum or at the worst in a court of law. Only if it was impossible to arrive at a solution by such means would a Court pronounce a winding up order. The embarrassment caused by conflicts between directors and the possible delays inevitable in litigation in achieving their resolution do not necessarily lead to the conclusion that a



























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top