RANHAMY v. JAYAWARDENA
1952 Present :
Gunasekara J.
RANHAMY, Appellant, and JAYAWARDENA (Police Sergeant),
Respondent
S. C. 1,337-M. C. Hatton, 17,674
Criminal Procedure
Code-Section 122 (1) and (3)-Statement to police-Admissibility in
evidence-Signature of witness taken-Irregularity-Evidence Ordinance, s. 157.
Section 122 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code provides that any police
officer investigating an offence " may examine orally any person supposed to be
acquainted with the facts and circumstances of the case and shall reduce into
writing any statement made by the person so examined, but no oath or affirmation
shall be administered to any such person, nor shall the statement be signed by
such person". The purpose of the express prohibition in regard to taking the
signature of a witness is that, otherwise, the witness would have a strong
motive for standing by the statement imputed to him in the police records
irrespective of the accuracy of the statement that he actually made or of the
police officer's note of it.
Although a statement made by a witness to a police officer in the course of an
inquiry under section 122 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Cod
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.