SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

COORAY P.A. v. FERNANDO H.J.G.


Cooray, P.A. V. Fernando, H.J.G.

1953 Present : Swan J.

P. A. COORAY,
Applicant, and H. J. G. FERNANDO, Respondent

Election Petition No. 6 of 1952, Kalutara

Election Petition-Presentation of petition-Failure to serve notice of it within prescribed time-Fatal defect-Modes of service of notice-Ceylon (Parliamentary Elections) Order in Council, 1946, Schedule 3, Rules 10, 15, 86 (2).

Where notice of the presentation of an election petition was sent by registered post to the successful candidate but the registered packets were not actually delivered to him until after the time limit of ten days prescribed by Rule 15 of Schedule 3 of the Parliamentary Elections Order in Council had elapsed-
Held, that when an election petition is presented the petitioner should serve notice of it on the respondent within the prescribed time. Failure to do so is a fatal defect. The fact that the respondent had knowledge of the presentation of the petition does not amount to notice and does not dispense with the requirement as to service of notice.

As to the mode of service, leaving copies of the notice and petition with the Registrar is not sufficient. Rule 10 of Schedule 3 is















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top