COORAY P.A. v. FERNANDO H.J.G.
1953 Present : Swan J.
P. A. COORAY, Applicant, and H. J. G. FERNANDO,
Respondent
Election Petition No. 6 of 1952, Kalutara
Election Petition-Presentation
of petition-Failure to serve notice of it within prescribed time-Fatal
defect-Modes of service of notice-Ceylon (Parliamentary Elections) Order in
Council, 1946, Schedule 3, Rules 10, 15, 86 (2).
Where notice of the presentation of an election petition was sent by
registered post to the successful candidate but the registered packets were not
actually delivered to him until after the time limit of ten days prescribed by
Rule 15 of Schedule 3 of the Parliamentary Elections Order in Council had
elapsed-
Held, that when an election petition is presented the petitioner should serve
notice of it on the respondent within the prescribed time. Failure to do so is a
fatal defect. The fact that the respondent had knowledge of the presentation of
the petition does not amount to notice and does not dispense with the
requirement as to service of notice.
As to the mode of service, leaving copies of the notice and petition with the
Registrar is not sufficient. Rule 10 of Schedule 3 is
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.