IN RE KANAGARATNAM
1951 Present : Gratiaen
J. and Gunasekara J.
In re KANAGARATNAM et al.
S. C. 19-21-D. C. Jaffna, 6,457B
Contempt of Court-Proceedings
for sequestration before judgment-Wilfully making false
statement-Ingredients-Bias of trial judge-Civil Procedure Code, s. 656.
The mere swearing of an affidavit which contains a statement that is factually
incorrect cannot amount to a contempt of court within the meaning of section 656
of the Civil Procedure Code. The provisions of that section empower a court to
punish as for a contempt only a person wilfully making a false statement.
A charge of contempt of court ought not to be tried by a judge who has already
reached the conclusion that the accused person is guilty.
APPEAL
from a judgment of the District Court,
Jaffna.
H. V. Perera, K.C., with T. Somasunderam, for the appellants.
R. A. Kannangara, Crown Counsel, for the Attorney-General.
Cur. adv. vult.
August 20, 1951. GUNASEKARA
J.-
Each of the three appellants was convicted in the District Court of Jaffna on a
charge of contempt and they were fined Rs. 1,000, Rs. 500 and Rs. 1,000,
respectively. At the close of the argument in appeal we set asid
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.