SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

IN RE KANAGARATNAM


In Re Kanagaratnam

1951 Present : Gratiaen J. and Gunasekara J.

In re KANAGARATNAM et al.

S. C. 19-21-D. C. Jaffna, 6,457B

Contempt of Court-Proceedings for sequestration before judgment-Wilfully making false statement-Ingredients-Bias of trial judge-Civil Procedure Code, s. 656.

The mere swearing of an affidavit which contains a statement that is factually incorrect cannot amount to a contempt of court within the meaning of section 656 of the Civil Procedure Code. The provisions of that section empower a court to punish as for a contempt only a person wilfully making a false statement.
A charge of contempt of court ought not to be tried by a judge who has already reached the conclusion that the accused person is guilty.

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court, Jaffna.

H. V. Perera, K.C., with T. Somasunderam, for the appellants.

R. A. Kannangara, Crown Counsel, for the Attorney-General.

Cur. adv. vult.

August 20, 1951. GUNASEKARA J.-

Each of the three appellants was convicted in the District Court of Jaffna on a charge of contempt and they were fined Rs. 1,000, Rs. 500 and Rs. 1,000, respectively. At the close of the argument in appeal we set asid

























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top