PERERA M.S. v. UNANTENNA
1953 Present : Rose C.J.
and Pulle J.
M. S. PERERA (Assistant Government Agent, Kandy), Appellant,
and UNANTENNA et al., Respondents
S. C. 9-10-D. C. Kandy, X 1,397
Mortgage-Land Redemption
Ordinance, No. 61 of 1942, as amended by Ordinance No. 62 of 1947-Section 3 (1)
(b)-" Transfer "-Includes voluntary conveyance of mortgaged property subsequent
to date of hypothecary decree- Hypothecary decree-Does mortgage become merged in
decree ?
Where a land is mortgaged and the mortgage is put in suit and decree is entered
against the mortgagor for the payment of the amount due on the mortgage bond, a
subsequent voluntary conveyance by the mortgagor in favour of the mortgagee, the
consideration for which is set off in full settlement of the amount due on the
said decree, is a transfer as contemplated in section 3 (1) (b) of the Land
Redemption Ordinance. In such a case it cannot be contended that,
notwithstanding that the charge on the land created by the mortgage bond existed
even after the decree, the debt due from the mortgagor personally to the
mortgagee became merged in the decree and ceased to exist and that the land,
therefore, was not
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.