SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PIYADASA v. HERATH


Piyadasa V. Herath

1952    Present    :    Pulle J.

PIYADASA,
Appellant, and HERATH (Inspector of Police),
Respondent

S. C. 639-M.C. Matale, 19,291

Offering gift in consideration of screening offender-A necessary ingredient of offence- Penal Code, s. 211.

In a prosecution under section 211 of the Penal Code for offering an illegal gratification for screening an offender it must be proved that the person who is sought by the gratification to be screened had committed the alleged offence.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Magistrate's Court, Matale.

Colvin R. de Silva, for the accused appellant.

R. S. Wanasundera, Crown Counsel, for the Attorney-General.

Cur adv. vult.

November 12, 1952. PULLE J.-

The prosecution in this case was laid under section 211 of the Penal Code, the charge being that the appellant offered an illegal gratification to a medical officer in consideration of his screening the appellant from legal punishment for the offence of causing grievous hurt to one Peiris Appuhamy. Of the arguments urged against the conviction at least one is entitled to succeed. In the case of The Queen v. Ramalingam 1[(1886) 2 N. L. R. 48.] it was held that in a pro

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top