SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

RODRIGO L.T.F. v. THE QUEEN


Rodrigo, L.T.F. V. The Queen

1952 Present: Gratiaen J. and L. M. D. de Silva J.

L. T. F. RODRIGO,
Appellant, and THE QUEEN, Respondent

 S. C. 23-D. C. (
Criminal) Colombo, N 1,639
 

Conspiracy-Accomplishment of the offence agreed upon-Proper indictment to bring in such circumstances-Penal Code, s. 113A.

Indictment-Amendment of it by Court-Proper procedure.

Criminal Procedure Code, s. 347 (6) (ii)-Alteration of verdict on appeal-Scope of-Abetment-Different types of abetment-Penal Code, ss. 100-103.

It is undesirable to include a charge of conspiracy in an indictment which alleges the actual commission of the offence in respect of which the conspiracy was formed.

The primary responsibility for the accuracy and suitability of an indictment rests with counsel for the prosecution, and not on the court. The court may, however, decide to amend the indictment on its own responsibility, but before such a decision in made, both the prosecution and the defence should be given an opportunity of making their submissions on the point.

The power vested in the Supreme Court under section 347 (6) (ii) of the Criminal Procedure Code to alter a verdict to a conviction on an


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top