RODRIGO L.T.F. v. THE QUEEN
1952 Present: Gratiaen
J. and L. M. D. de Silva J.
L. T. F. RODRIGO, Appellant, and THE QUEEN, Respondent
S. C. 23-D. C. (Criminal) Colombo, N 1,639
Conspiracy-Accomplishment of
the offence agreed upon-Proper indictment to bring in such circumstances-Penal
Code, s. 113A.
Indictment-Amendment of it by Court-Proper procedure.
Criminal Procedure Code, s. 347 (6) (ii)-Alteration of verdict on
appeal-Scope of-Abetment-Different types of abetment-Penal Code, ss. 100-103.
It is undesirable to include a charge of conspiracy in an indictment which
alleges the actual commission of the offence in respect of which the conspiracy
was formed.
The primary responsibility for the accuracy and suitability of an indictment
rests with counsel for the prosecution, and not on the court. The court may,
however, decide to amend the indictment on its own responsibility, but before
such a decision in made, both the prosecution and the defence should be given an
opportunity of making their submissions on the point.
The power vested in the Supreme Court under section 347 (6) (ii) of the Criminal
Procedure Code to alter a verdict to a conviction on an
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.