DON ABRAHAM R.A. v. CHRISTOFFELSZ T.H.
1953 Present: Nagalingam
A.C.J.
R. A. DON ABRAHAM, Petitioner, and T. H. CHRISTOFFELSZ
(Inspector of Police), Respondent
S. C. 171-Application in Revision in M. C, Kanadulla, 524
Autrefois acquit-Failure of
prosecutor to lead evidence-"Discharge" of accused Right of prosecutor to
institute fresh proceedings-Criminal Procedure Code,.ss. 190, 330.
On the date of trial of a summary case the chief witness for the prosecution was
absent although summons had been served on him. The prosecuting: officer did not
apply for a warrant on the witness, but stated that he was not prepared to go on
with the case. Thereupon, the Court " discharged " the accused.
Held, that the order of discharge was tantamount to an acquittal under section
190 of the Criminal Procedure Code and that the accused could not be prosecuted
again in respect of the same charge.
APPLICATION
to revise a judgment of the Magistrate's
Court, Kanadulla.
W. D. Gunasekera, for the accused petitioner.
A. Mahendrarajah, Crown Counsel, for the Attorney-General.
September 15, 1953. NAGALINGAM A.C.J.-
This is an application in revision by the accused who has been c
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.